Reading the Catcher in the Rye, Part 1
So it turns out it's hard to talk coherently about half of a great novel within our self-imposed four minute deadline. Nonetheless, I tried. Rereading Catcher with the nerdfighters, I am struck by what an accomplished novel it is--not a hair out of place, as one might say of a bride. But the sexuality of the novel troubles me much more now than it did in high school--the conflation of femininity and innocence, the belief that good men have some kind of moral duty to protect young women from themselves. Holden is a sweet kid, and a good kid. The problem (or so it seems to me) is not the narrator but his story.
I can forgive a narrator most anything. A story, though, is harder to forgive.
14 Comments:
I enjoyed your commentary, but I suggest that you throw a montage into the next video just to get around the 4-minute-rule. I would love to hear you talk at length about the book.
I think you have to look at the sexuality issues of Holden in not only the context of the time that the book was written, but also when Salinger was coming of age - when the role of women was being redefined in light of WW11.
Here is a bigger question - can the story itself be taken out of it's time? Does the time it is written, the time it is written about, make a difference in how the story itself is interpreted and viewed?
And I do think you are the Oprah of YA Lit.. so you go girlfriend!
That's far too many semi-colons dude, aka Cheating. Really that's just a bunch of simple sentences.
I would totally marry you just for the way you say "ducks."
Great entry. Super happy to hear you talking about Catcher in the Rye...makes me realize that I need to read it again. (As I do with most everything...)
I like that, that it's easier to forgive the narrator than the story. I hadn't really thought about it, but that makes a lot of sense. Maybe it's that we can forgive a narrator because they're human and we're human so we can identify with them on a deeper level, where as a story is just sort of the abstract concept of time and the sequence of events, like "beads on a string", which is, as the Tralfamadorians say, simply stupid. I love the Blurbing Book Club, it always makes me think like this.
This is off topic, but is Hank going to be following up on the deal he made on YouTube as obamasidiots? A lot of people donated money for that, and it seems pretty wrong to not ever do a follow up. Sex and the City isn't the only movie he can go to dressed as a woman....
That's deep, John.
I noticed the overly used "you" as well, but didn't think much of it. You had a brilliant comment on the reason for you vs. I. I totally agree. It's so much easier to take yourself (so to say) out of any difficult situation, and everything Holden is explaining is difficult for him to think/talk about in one way or another.
Thanks so much for motivating me to read this again - finally.
ey ey, hi!
but in Italy there isn't, your book...ufff!
when it come out? do you know something?
tnks
bea
I would also love to hear you talk about this book. This is our summer reading book, and I thought it's be absolutely awful, but, I ended up loving it. Not for the story or Holden, but for its structure and depth. I'm planning on re-reading it, again.
Oh and by the way, you are definitely one of my favorite authors. It'd be very exciting if you could reply.
Have you read Frank Portmans King Dork? And if so, do you think he's being unnecessary harsh on Catcher in the rye? I started reading it after I'd read King Dork and by then my perception of it was very coloured by what Portman wrote about it, and I couldn't finish it, which was a first for me when it comes to books.
Any suggestions about how to overcome my Catcher-cult prejudice and enjoy the book?
Thanks so much for the commentary. The reason I love this book so much is that when you think about the plot, you don't really hear a good story, but coupled with Holden's thoughts and narrations and when you think about all the events and how they are affecting Holden and everything, its a brilliant book. Where can I find part 2?
I find the sexuality troubling, but I think it's a part of what makes the book so powerful. I mean, there are certain points where I just want to slap Holden over some of his ridiculous ideas about girls, but then, I've felt the same about a lot of the real boys in my life too, particularly when we were all around Holden's age. It's so painful to feel that way about somebody you know is a really good person.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home